• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

ABF.

Research Advancing Justice

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • ABF Fellows
  • Donate
  • Research
    • Research
      • Learning and Practicing Law
      • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
      • Making and Implementing Law
      • See Recent Research
    • Other Work
      • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
      • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
      • Access to Justice Research Initiative
      • Law & Social Inquiry
  • People
  • Programs
    • Faculty Scholars
    • Postdoctoral Fellowships
    • Doctoral Fellowships
    • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
    • Impact Funds
      • The Ruth Bader Ginsburg Endowed Fund for Research in Civil Rights and Gender Equality
      • The William C. Hubbard Law & Education Conference Endowment
      • The William H. Neukom Fellows Campaign for a Research Chair in Diversity and Law
    • Donate
      • Leave a Legacy
      • Donor Stories
  • News & Events
  • About
    • Board of Directors
Home > Fellows > Professor Catherine Ross, New York Life Fellow, Publishes “What the First Amendment Really Says About Whether Trump Incited the Capitol Riot” for Future Tense Publication

Professor Catherine Ross, New York Life Fellow, Publishes “What the First Amendment Really Says About Whether Trump Incited the Capitol Riot” for Future Tense Publication

February 08, 2020

Catherine Ross
Catherine Ross, photo courtesy of George Washington Law

Professor Catherine Ross, New York Life Fellow and Fred C. Stevenson Research Professor of Law at The George Washington University Law School, published an article for the publication Future Tense titled “What the First Amendment Really Says About Whether Trump Incited the Capitol Riot”. In the article, Professor Ross examines whether President Trump’s speech given shortly before the January 6th riot on the capitol satisfy a legal definition of incitement. She looks toward the historic ruling of She Brandenburg vs. Ohio (1969) and examines Trump’s words and actions leading up to the riot to deconstruct the relationship between Trump, the rioters, the First Amendment and the definition of incitement.

Read the article here.

 

Tags: Fellows, Fellows in the News

  • About
  • People
  • Careers
  • For Media
  • Logos & Colors
  • Annual Report
    • Financial Report
  • ABF Fellows
  • Research
  • Learning and Practicing Law
  • Protecting Rights and Accessing Justice
  • Making and Implementing Law
  • Other Work
  • ABF Newsletter: Researching Law
  • ABF Podcast: Whose Law is it Anyway?
  • Access to Justice Research Initiative
  • Law & Social Inquiry
  • Programs
  • Faculty Scholars
  • Postdoctoral Fellowships
  • Doctoral Fellowships
  • Undergraduate Fellowships
  • Giving
  • Donor Stories
  • Impact Funds
  • Leave a Legacy
  • News & Events

Sign up for ABF News:

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Logo
Research Advancing Justice
  • Contact Us
  • Contact the Fellows
  • Media Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
American Bar Foundation
750 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60611-4403
© 2025 American Bar Foundation
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in ABF publications are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Bar Foundation or the American Bar Association. The AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION, ABF and related seal trademarks as used by the American Bar Foundation are owned by the American Bar Association and used under license.